Archive for June, 2006

friday finally!!! (and fundraising push)

June 30, 2006

ah… finally got to give up the dreaded oncall pager! w00t!

there’s some great blogging going on this week, and with the end of the financial quarter coming up a lot of candidates are vying for attention. i have saved some money and i generally donate right before the deadline as part of a fundraising push. the following folks are candidates i have given to or am going to give to before the end of the day (yes, today is the deadline!). i have decided to concentrate my money in texas, as i sincerely believe that in order to beat the republicans we have to take them down here in texas. this is their seat of power. this is where the fight begins.

the only exception i’m making to my “donate in my own backyard” credo is a wonderful candidate from illinois. last night i dropped some change to fighting dem john laesch, who is opposing speaker hastert. i could sing john’s praises all day; i think he’s great. here is his recommended dkos diary from last night. john is definitely on the right side of the issues and he’s got serious grassroots traction. here is a short blurb from his website:

* A health care system that ensures every American has access to affordable healthcare without overburdening government resources.
* An economy that puts the needs of Main Street before the desires of Wall Street while defending the American Dream for future generations.
* An education system that expands upon the dedication of family, promotes responsibility, and rewards achievement while opening the door to infinite possibilities.
* A national energy policy that focuses on reducing foreign energy dependence and national consumption, promotes alternative energy sources and strives for sustainability.
* A foreign policy that includes a Success Strategy for Iraq in the short-term and respects other nations; safeguards our security, the environment and workers rights in the long-term.
* A political system that works to ensure the integrity of our electoral system, increases voter turnout and reduces the influence of special interest groups.

drop some change in john’s pocket, will ya?

the next candidate i’m donating to is john courage. glenn smith has an excellent post up on why john courage can beat lamar smith. here’s an except from glenn’s post:

A recent Lake Research Partners poll put Smith’s re-elect at 31 percent. More than 60 percent were willing to consider someone else. Smith has a positive/negative of 37/40. Congress has a negative rating of 71 percent. Bush’s positives are down to 44, better than he’s doing in some places, but it’s like he’s fallen off the Devil’s Backbone here.

I don’t know John Courage personally. I hope I get to know him soon. He’s a married father of four, a Air Force veteran, a teacher, an honest guy who had the courage to run against the odds, and now the odds are running in his favor.

John Courage is right on Social Security, health care, the environment. He’s a teacher, and he’s been hanging with the schoolkids while Bushco leaves them all behind. But it’s his backbone, his Patriot’s Backbone, not the Devil’s, that attracts me to John. And that’s what’s going to make us all proud when he’s in Congress.

on top of all this, today john was added to the mydd & kos endorsed netroots page! this is fantastic news for the campaign. way to go, team courage!! here’s john’s donation link. now, if you don’t have any spare change to give to john, you can help him in another way. he has made the top five of mark warner’s mapchangers contest! head over to this page and register for an account. the top ten candidates are now going to vy for a fundraiser with warner himself. *please* vote for john courage. warner could bring in a ton of dough and that could put john over the top.

the next candidate who’s getting some change today is glenn melancon. glenn’s district is up here in north texas, and he’s running on a platform of economic security for america’s working families. i had the opportunity to socialise with glenn at our blogger’s caucus, and he made a real good impression. i also heard him speak at the democratic veterans caucus, and he was eloquent and sincere. i think he “gets it”. from his website:

As the Washington corporate elite self-destructs right before our eyes, “We the people” must seize the opportunity and demand a new direction. We can’t allow the lobbyists and consultantocracy to steal our revolution after the November election. The new Congress needs an aggressive “First 100 Days” agenda to restore the American Dream. I will lead the fight for the real change Texas Families deserve.

Our founding fathers wanted us to be a City on a Hill, a beacon guiding the rest of humanity toward the blessings of liberty. As Americans we have a rich and proud history. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt led the United States through the Great Depression and World War II by correctly identifying the country’s problems and acting swiftly to solve them.

It’s time to liberate ourselves from the corporate elite and follow FDR’s example. I will make the economic security of working families the highest national priority.

In the First 100 Days Congress must act to protect and promote well-paying American jobs. My plan calls for eliminating corporate welfare programs that reward companies for shipping jobs overseas. No company should get a tax break for outsourcing American jobs.

We must reverse the decline in real wages and benefits for working families. Something is radically wrong with our economy when worker productivity, CEO compensation, stock prices and corporate profits go up while salaries of the average worker go down.

Currently the corporate elite and their partners in the media and Congress are trying to redirect voters’ anger away from the new “Robber Oil and Gas Barons” and toward immigrants. Texas families and immigrant families share the same dream: to work hard, play by the rules and know that at the end of the day they’ve earned a living wage.

and hey, any candidate who puts an FDR poster on their main page gets points from me. here is glenn’s donate link.

the next candidate i am going to contribute to is larry stallings. larry is running for place 122 in the texas legislature. what i like about larry is that he is really engaged in his district and he understands the issues that are important to his constituents. one of those hot button issues is the texas trans corridor:

The Texas Trans Corridor is an elaborate plan conceived by Rick Perry and supported by Frank Corte that forces Texans to pay to drive on roads we constructed with our own tax dollars!

That’s right. We pay twice. [...]

And the taxation is not a minimal expense. The estimated cost is $3000 per Texas family per year.

We cannot allow the taxing of public highways. People for Effective Transportation writes, “We can no longer vote along party lines. We must shop the ballot, de-elect the looters and elect a better candidate.” In Texas District 122, that candidate is Larry Stallings.

his wife is wonderful, too, which speaks volumes. this is one of those campaigns where a few dollars will go a long way, and i urge you to drop some change in larry’s pocket.

the next candidate that’ll receive some of my hard earned dollars is david pillow\. david is running in texas 94. this is my district, so naturally i’m going to drop some change. but there are more reasons that i’m contributing other than that fact. for one thing, as many locals know, state rep. kent grusendorf – an 18 year GOP incumbent – got squashed by primary challenger dianne patrick. she whipped him good. do-nothing kent – who headed the education committee in austin – got whipped for may reasons, which included his lack of achievement on the education committee, a strong “throw the bums out” undercurrent in this district, and a large chunk of democratic voters crossing over in the open primary to help oust him. this presents david pillow with a prime opportunity. district 94 residents have shown they are hungry for change. now the thing is, dianne patrick ran on a democratic education platform. unfortunately, she’s not going to be able to push her agenda in austin. speaker craddick was not happy to lose his pawn grusendorf, and dianne pissed off a lot of repub power players when she beat kent. as a republican, she cannot push the democratic education plan, and most likely will be punished by speaker craddick. she won’t get committee appointments and she won’t have any power. she’ll just be a seat-filler. i say this as someone who respects what patrick has accomplished in the past. but this is just the reality of her situation. david pillow on the other hand, can strongly push the democratic agenda. he doesn’t have to run away from his party, he doesn’t have to run away from his values, and he doesn’t have to pretend he’s a republican in order to speak out for the people of the 94th district. i have been able to meet david and he is a genuine, down to earth guy who cares about the future of this state. if you want real change, you have to vote for david. i’ve got an email in to his campaign manager, because i don’t see a donation link online (this is part of the reason we asked for donations to activate actblue in texas). when i get one i’ll post it.

and finally, the last person i’m donating to today is david harris. if you’ve been living under a rock and haven’t read about dave yet, here is a good starting point. dave is right on the issues: he’s pro-choice, pro-environment, has a strong national security background, and is an all-around genuine guy. i have had the pleasure of being friends with dave and michelle for a while now, and i have never met two people who were more dedicated to the democratic party and progressive politics. dave’s a fighting dem who served in iraq and wants to continue to serve his country.

his opponent, joe barton, is an out of touch delay rubber stamp. it’s long past time for him to go. put simply, barton doesn’t give a crap about us. he is the head of the house energy and commerce committee, and as the mailbomb he dropped on the district yesterday says, “More than 50 percent of the legislation that reaches the House floor for a vote passes through this committee, which has jurisdiction over such important issues as energy, health care, trade, consumer protection, and telecommunications.” this means that a man who is bought and sold by the energy and telco sectors is responsible for overseeing legislation effecting those industries. barton’s spearheaded the effort to kill net neutrality. on page two of that same mailbomb, barton proudly displays a picture of himself watching bush sign the horrible energy bill, which was a giveaway to the energy industry and did nothing to relieve consumers who are straining to pay their gas and electric bills. in the mailbomb he also brags that drilling in ANWR is a long term solution to our energy crisis. so he’s not only stupid, he’s completely out of touch as well.

but you know, i could talk shit about barton all day. he’s horrible. instead, let me tell you how donating to dave could help us pull out a win. first of all, the urban parts of this district are taken care of. there are several democratic groups that are busting their butts canvassing arlington and south fort worth right now. we are making good contacts. what dave’s campaign needs to do is concentrate in the lower counties, the rural parts of the district. we don’t need to buy tv ads down there; we need to send mail. we don’t need to launch a blog campaign; we need to show up at events and meet the people of the district. dave is already doing the heavy lifting there and has been making serious inroads everywhere he goes. but we need money for mailers. right now they’re doing a 2000 X 5 campaign. that would give us enough money to mailbomb the rural areas for the rest of the campaign. so for only 10K we can make this a race. your donation will go a loooong way here. please donate today and let’s boot barton!

and finally, the last thing i wanna link today is this entry by jerome. it’s a nice trip down memory lane for those of us who were around during the early days of dean. it also credits dean nation – something which was sorely lacking in the dean post-mortems. i’m proud of the work we did there even if we didn’t accomplish our goal. we laid the groundwork; we blazed a trail; we made great friends and memories. i’ll never forget the experiences or the lessons learned. thanks for finally writing it all down jerome.

update: a nice courage interview w/tracy russo is posted here.

weekend wrap up and a few linky-doos

June 27, 2006

hey folks, sorry, it has been a super busy weekend around the annatopia household.

on saturday, the monkey and i accompanied the next congressman from the sixth congressional district of texas, david harris, and his lovely wife and children to the travelling vietnam war memorial wall. it was… stirring. for those who don’t know, the memorial is made 3/4 scale and travels around the country. it came to arlington last week and i knew i had to stop by, especially considering these times. when i walked up to it, i was struck by it’s sheer size. i had to stand there for a moment and shed some tears. it was truly moving. dave and michelle stopped by with the kids and their friend destiny. i have some great pictures of dave at the wall that i’ll post later. shortly thereafter, sparky & jennifer joined us, then we (minus the harrises) convened at our local watering hole, where i drank way too much. heh.

then on sunday the monkey and i ventured over to the AA center to see professional bullriding! yea, i know, that’s probably the last thing you’d expect me to write on this blog, but whatever. see, i grew up in rural florida, and i used to go to the rodeo all the time when i was a kid. i kinda got away from that lifestyle when i reached puberty, but lately i’ve been rediscovering my love for all things redneck (yea, percy’s gonna love that – LOL). the monkey and i became PBR fans sometime in the middle of last season, and when we heard the tour was coming to dallas, well, we had to go. i had been trying to pull some good seats for weeks now without success. on saturday morning i woke up and said what the hell and tried again. i ended up pulling 3rd row seats right by the chutes (you can see how close we were by checkin out this pic). i think what happened was that they held tickets for fan club members, and whatever ones didn’t sell were released the day of the event. SCORE! so i bought them and we went and wow, what a great time!

i honestly haven’t had that much fun at a sporting event in years, and we are going back next year without a doubt. the PBR puts on one helluva show. and the hot cowboys don’t hurt, either – LOL. after the event, many of them came out to sign autographs. i must say that the PBR riders are some of the nicest, most grounded “stars” you can ever meet. they were very gracious and took the time to make sure everyone got their stuff signed, they posed for pictures, and flashed really nice smiles for my camera. the hilight of the day was getting to briefly meet guillherme marchi, who’s #1 right now. the monkey told guillherme he was going to get the title this year (he was #2 after the finals last year), and guillherme smiled and got a real kick out of that. some of the guys didn’t come out to sign because they’re contractually obligated to only do sigs at official PBR signings, but we scored anyway. as we were driving out, we saw justin mcbride (last year’s champ) leaving, so i jumped out of the car and got my book signed. he was really gracious (i know i keep using that word but it just fits so well). i think i am the only person who scored a mcbride autograph all weekend. heh. the only thing that would have topped off the weekend would be to have met adriana moraes, a brasilian bullrider who just rocks my world. but maybe next time. =)

and naturally, i got the damn oncall pager last friday so as usual updates may be sparse this week. a special thanks to the pretzel for covering me for a few hours on sunday so i could go ogle hot cowboys and mean bulls.

also, i wanted to let everybody popping by here know that texaskos had changed it’s name to something much more appropriate – TexasKAOS! i really, really adore that community over there and am interested in building it up. if you live in texas, or if you’re an expat, you need to get over there and make yourself an account. it is my favorite blog and i’ve taken to living over there when i’m not around here..

and one last thing… clark community net has gotten a shiny new facelift. it looks great! i registered over there after the texas convention and have been mainly lurking. i expect i’ll take a more active roll over there after the fall elections. i sincerely do want clark to run again. the man has what it takes and i’m backing him 100000%. seems i’m not the only one, either. michelle thinks it’s going to be clark/harman. i personally would love to see clark/sebelius. i am super impressed with governor sebelius and think she would make a fine veep. but back to clark… the redesign is spiffy, and they were kind enough to give a link to this little bog. for that i am very grateful. thanks, yall, and GO CLARK!

p.s. two thing. go visit McBlogger! i just got turned on to that site recently and it’s hysterical.

also, i’d intended to change blog templates over the weekend, but obviously i was too busy. i don’t know what the hell is going on with this template. the background image isn’t loading and the comment window isn’t expandable anymore. *sigh* i’ll get to it this weekend. please bear with me.

p.s.s. go click the mapchangers blogad at the left!!! john courage needs you, and congress needs courage!!

beck

June 22, 2006

if you play the video, i’d suggest listening via your headphones. i still haven’t figured out the optimal sound recording setting on the camera, and this sounds like crud on speakers. regardless, it’s interesting for the visuals. it’s beck performing “clap hands” with a short interlude from “one foot in the grave”. pics are here.

omg – funniest. post. ever.

June 20, 2006

i just had to post this up because everyone on the planet should read the conclusion to attaturk’s brilliant “the wankery” series. he’s compiled all four parts into one massive post. i swear it is the funniest thing i have read in months. be careful, it is “pee your pants funny”.

this TDP policy is not right and needs to be changed

June 20, 2006

I got a phone call late last week from one of my friends who is currently toiling in the service of a congressional candidate here in Texas. This person told me some truly shocking news: The Texas Democratic party charges our candidates for access to that Voter File they were bragging about during the convention. I was shocked to hear this because the party used to give our candidates free access to the old voter database.

Charging our candidates for this access is completely boneheaded, and I propose that the first thing that we change about this party is the policy of charging our candidates for access to the Voter File.

After I received that phone call, I sent out an email blast asking for input and opinions on this troubling policy. I received quite a few emails back from other people working for state level and federal level candidates in Texas. They all told me the same troubling story, and some elaborated on just how boneheaded this policy has become. I’ll get to that in a moment, but first here are the facts as I know it.

The TDP currently charges our candidates 20% of the fair market value for the data, and gives the other 80% as an in-kind contribution. The dollar figure for that 20% varies from race to race. I heard numbers as low as $85 and as high as $2000 from campaign workers I spoke to over the weekend. In addition, the TDP has in some cases not been upfront about charging for this access. I was told by two sources that the agreement a campaign has to sign in order to get access to the Voter File does not mention charges until page six. Basically, it’s buried and the TDP isn’t advertising the fact that they are charging candidates. I’m still looking to get a copy of the agreement and will post it if someone sends it to me (confidentiality is assured).

I know of one particularly eggregious case where the charges were sprung on a primary candidate literally one day before their access was cut off. I have also been told of a case where a TDP staffer (who shall remain nameless – for now) made some nasty phone calls to a candidate when they noticed a spike in activity on their logins. I’ve been told this spike occurred because staffers realised their access was about to be cut off and they didn’t want to lose the data they were already sifting through, so they downloaded the whole file for their district. While you may not agree with their solution, I believe it was a sensible move considering that they were being threatened with losing access to the most valuable tool any campaign in Texas can utilise for voter identification.

It is my assertion that the TDP should provide free and unfettered access to the Voter File to any Democratic candidate in the state of Texas. I propose that we as a communinty – the netroots, grassroots, and reformers – unite to make this happen.

Over the past few days I have heard a myriad of excuses defending TDP’s decision to charge candidates for this access. .

The most frequent excuse that people have brought up is money. It cost money to build the Voter File and it costs money to maintain it. Some reminded me that the TDP is broke. I’ve also heard that the TDP is charging for this file due to some sort of agreement they have with the vendor who supplied the data (although I have no further details on what sort of agreement may or may not exist). You know what? Blah blah blah. It’s just more excuses.

You want to talk about money? How’s this: The TDP is not giving any financial support directly to candidates during this election cycle. The very least they could do is provide free and unfettered access to the Voter File.

And furthermore, the main thing I heard from every TDP staff/elected official during the convention was how badly the party needs money. As I see it, there is little incentive to give money. After all, even former TDP consultants say the TDP is irrelevant. So why should I waste precious resources on contributing to a party that can’t seem to produce tangible evidence that I should do so? Thanks to ActBlue and the internet, I can easily give my money to candidates of my choosing and I don’t even have to spend money on a stamp.

Economics 101: incentives drive consumer demand.

I propose that the TDP needs to give people an incentive to donate. “Wanting to beat Republicans” isn’t enough. If the TDP gave our candidates free access to the voter file, that is a huge fundraising incentive. The TDP could then go to the people – our base, the grassroots – and say, “If you give us money, this is where it’s going. It’s going to help ALL of our candidates.” That is a real, tangible action that donors can feel good about supporting.

That incentive also allows the small donor – such as those recently tapped by recent campaigns and the DNC, and long-courted by the Republicans in their successful fundraising drives – to feel as though their dollar goes further.

Others I spoke to felt that 80% in kind contributions were generous.

I sympathise with that argument, but I’d like to point out that some campaigns really can’t afford to spend even $85 on access. If we are going to get serious about the 50 state strategy, then we have to realise that until donors have enough incentive to fund the party, some of our candidates will lack serious resources. For example, I’m sure there are campaigns out in rural Texas that spend less than $2000 per cycle. For Democrats in those places, it’s really a struggle. Hell, it’s a struggle for some campaigns in urban areas. In those type of races, every penny counts. Maybe an $85 maildrop to every registered Democrat in Pecos county would put one of our folks over the top. So forgive me if the “generosity” excuse doesn’t seem to outweigh my concerns.

Furthermore, it’s been pointed out to me that the Voter File is a precious resource, and as such are not free. Indeed I would argue that it is precisely because of it’s value that our candidates should be able to freely access it.

Having now spent three election cycles volunteering for campaigns, I’ve learned that one of the very first things you have to do is identify your constituency. You’ve got to know who’s doors to knock on and who’s to skip, who to mailbomb and who to forget. Without such comprehensive information, a campaign must waste time and money compiling information which should be made readily available to them. I can’t stress this enough, and I’m sure that other people who’ve worked on campaigns would agree with me.

We must give our candidates access to this valuable campaign tool, and we must do it now. Refusing to change this wrongheaded policy would prove that the TDP is truly out of touch with it’s grassroots and it’s base.

The state chair’s election proved that there are two distinct factions within the party. I believe there is at least some overlap in goals among those factions. I hope that both Richie supporters and the reformers who backed Maxey, Urbina-Jones, and Rodgers share at least one common goal: challenging Republicans everywhere. I know the reformers get that, and I do know that at least some of the Richie folks get it as well. But I am honestly asking if there are enough Richie supporters out there who will stand with the reformers and demand that the party do the right thing for our team.

We have an election to win in November, and we can’t be handicapping our candidates at this point. If there is a candidate out there who has not been able to come up with funds to pay for access, I believe it’s time to write it off and give it to them for free. And afterwards, send out a fundraising pitch to the triple Ds and tell them what you did. Trust me TDP you will get the money.

I will go so far as to say that if the TDP changes it’s policy and begins giving free access to the Voter File, I will become a sustaining member. Period. And I am sure I’m not the only one. If the TDP could recruit a few hundred sustaining members, the problem of paying for maintaining the Voter File is solved. That would be one less financial worry for the party, and we could move on to expanding the playing field for Democrats.

Now I’m sure that there is some policy that currently prevents this from happening. I don’t know what it is. There’s nothing in the rules or platform, and nothing posted about it on the TDP website either. All I know for sure is that this is a recent change.

I’m mainly putting up this post as an FYI so that the texroots will be aware of this crap. I am going to call my SDEC members (all SDEC contact info is posted here) and ask them if they can provide me with this policy in writing. I’m also going to try and find out how we change this. We don’t have much time and our candidates need our help. And even if we do not succeed in this election cycle, perhaps we can craft a long term plan for changing this boneheaded policy so that our future candidates will not be handicapped by lack of access to the Voter File.

update: After I finished composing this entry, I received a copy of the pertinent paperwork. You can download the License Agreement here and the Online Voter File Use Policy here. Notice that the fees are not mentioned until section F of the paperwork. I was also told by a source that this paperwork was sent in an email without a subject. I don’t know about you, but if I wanted to get someone’s attention, I’d put a subject in the email or flag the email as “urgent”. BTW, here is a chart of the fee scale:

Now I’ll tell you something that should trip the outrage-o-meter. I was also told by another source who is in a position to know that the current version of the Voter File does not contain any information from the Constitutional Amendment election (or *any* amendment election, for that matter), nor does it contain any 2006 Primary data for over 90% of Texas counties. WTF??? My source explained that when they asked why the Primary data was not included, they were told that, “We didn’t bother to collect those counties’ primary data because we don’t have contested races there.” As my source said, tell that to the statewide candidates! For them *every county* is a contested county! This is also an issue I’ll be raising w/my SDEC representatives, and I urge the texroots to do the same.

I’ll be following up on this as more information becomes available.

a non-neutral internet

June 19, 2006

via mydd, it begins:

Shaw Communications and its Canada-based cable MSO subsidiary have filed a series of court documents that aim to “set to record straight” regarding a “Quality of Service Enhancement” package being offered to Vonage customers and customers of other third-party VoIP services that leverage the public Internet.

The documents, filed in the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in Calgary, note that Shaw’s IP-based phone service is offered over the operator’s QoS-enabled, managed network, while Vonage’s service travels the public Internet and is open to packet delays and other “inherent limitations.”

Shaw reiterated that its high-speed data customers who also use the Vonage service can take the QoS Enhancement service on a completely optional basis. The enhancement runs $10 per month.

Vonage has previously complained of the tactic, referring to it as a “thinly-veiled VoIP tax,” and has since requested that the Canadian Radio-Television & Telecommunications Commission step in to investigate the matter.

news link via CED broadband magazine. it’s time to make the phone calls, if you haven’t already.

astroturf ad

June 19, 2006

just an FYI… you may notice that there is a new ad running on this site right now. it’s in the bottom position of the adstrip. just a heads up folks, that ad was purchased by a telco-backed astroturf group.

i’m on several mailing lists and we’ve tried to discuss how to handle this situation, whether to accept the ad, etc etc.

well, i decided to take the ad. some folks might have a problem with that, and i understand that, but let me explain my reasoning.

first, i have a very high bar for ad rejection. there are some ads i certainly would not run. for example, you will NEVER see an ad from focus on the family here.

second, i don’t charge much for ads, but i have decided that instead of just taking the money, i am going to donate the proceeds from the ad to SaveTheInternet.com. i would like to kindly thank the telcos behind the astroturf “internet of the future” ad for providing me with the funds to donate to this worthy cause.

third, this gives me an opportunity to put up links to the following posts on net neutrality. please take the time to browse through these and educate yourself on the importance of this issue:
the agonist’s net neutrality section
rep. markey speaks about net neutrality on the house floor
the net neutrality tag of posts on mydd

and finally, i have added a free ad at the top of my adspace pointing people to SaveTheInternet.com. i hope that with it’s prominent placing, it gets a lot of click-throughs.

net neutrality will effect every internet user. it is my opinion that we must support NN. don’t let the telcos dictate what we can and cannot do on the internet!

and finally, a thank you to steve gilliard for suggesting that we donate the proceeds of the ads to save the internet.

um, yea.

June 18, 2006

what he says.

ActBlue goal reached – THANK YOU!!!

June 17, 2006

hey everyone – just wanted to let you know that we reached our $5000 ActBlue goal! the actblue folks sent me an email last night:

Hey Anna,

Well done!!! Now that we’ve crossed $5k in funds for our work in
Texas we’re full speed ahead.

Will keep you up to date on timeline, but I’m anticipating we’ll be up
and running by the first week in July.

i would like to extend a personal THANK YOU to everyone who donated via the TexRoots page:

Sean-Paul, Mike C., Gale B., Raines C., Daniel B., Kenneth F., Marc G., Perry D., John M., Phillip M., Hardy H., Nathan N., Martha G., Karl-Thomas M., Stace M., Charles K., me (LOL), and the monkey. There were several people who donated before we linked up on the TexRoots page. If you donated before we did this, please speak up so I can add you to the THANK YOU LIST.

actblue needs you – empty your cups

June 15, 2006

ever since we got back from the convention, several of us blogger types have been trying to figure out how to leverage what has been built in texas in order to help our candidates in the fall. one idea that we seemed to have come to a consensus on is trying to raise money for all the wonderful candidates who took the time to come down and say hi at the bloggers caucus. david van os, john courage, glenn melancon, sheila ford, paula hightower peirson, and many more came out to our shindig. we had the opportunity to get to know them *as people*, which was very refreshing. i will personally say that all of them are outstanding, and that’s primarily why i’m able to just shuffle that whole chair’s race thing into the background and get back to work. there’s no need for our candidates to suffer because someone’s feelings got hurt.

ANYHOO – the point of this post is to act yall to empty your cups just a bit and help us activate actblue in texas. right now actblue is only able to raise money for federal candidates. i’ve been speaking with one of the actblue guys over the past few days, and he’s given us a way to bring valinda and david and maria luisa and all the others onboard. it just takes money: $5000. we are only $460 away from reaching that goal and activating actblue in texas. K-T writes:

As many of you know, ActBlue is the federal clearinghouse for donations to Democratic candidates, having channeled over $5.5 million to Dem contenders so far. But did you know, that with your help, you can activate it for Texas… for statewide, state house, and state senate candidates?

Together, Texas bloggers have agreed to help activate ActBlue for our state’s non-federal candidates by asking our readers to put us over the top. Normally, ActBlue asks each state to raise $10,000 before moving forward (Texas being at $4,500 so far). But we’ve got some good news for you from the people at ActBlue.

However, in doing some more preliminary research Texas turns out to be similar to some other states we’ve already done — so if we could break $5000 we’d be ready to move ahead with it. Would the texroots be able to help us out with the remaining $1000 by the end of the month?

As far as timeline, my aim would be to have everything ready to go as early in July as we can.

So we ask you, will you, the TexRoots get us over the $5,000 mark and activate ActBlue for all our state non-federal candidates? Do it here – donate today!

This is the most important thing you can do for the Hank Gilberts, Juan Garcias, and Kathi Thomas’s of Texas as we move forward in unity to support our TexRoots candidates to be announced in the coming months by the Texas blogosphere.

i know everyone’s broke right now, but consider this. when we started talking about this yesterday, there was about $4100 in the pot. we’re got it up about $500 just amongst ourselves (all 14 of us – LOL). i’m hopeful that we can find enough people to raise that last $460. if we can do this, in july we’ll all have an easy way to donate to our state candidates.

after what i witnessed this weekend, i’m more convinced than ever that our candidates shouldn’t suffer just because some parts of the apparatus are inept, decrepit, or just plain underfunded. need our help and this is the first step we can take collectively. i think i can safely speak for all of us bloggers when we say we want to do our part.

empty your cups. donate today.